MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Prediction of Emilio Gomez [756th] vs Jason Jung [856th] Head-to-Head At The

By Wojtek Kolan

Head-To-Head: Gomez 2 - 1 Jung

They have played 6 sets in total, with Gomez winning 4 and Jung winning 2. The last match between Gomez and Jung was at the Savannah Challenger, 25-04-2022, First, Clay with Jason Jung getting the victory 6-2 4-4 ret..

Players Head-To-Head Match Wins
Emilio Gomez 2
Jason Jung 1
Gomez vs Jung H2H Profile
Gomez Stats Jung
0% (0-0) YTD Win/Loss 0% (0-0)
2 Head-to-Head 1
756 Ranking 856
90 Highest Rank 114
33 Age 35
R Plays R
14 Titles 8
56% (427-330) Career Total W/L 56% (412-327)
$571,180 Career Prize Money $350,585
0 Clay H2H 1
2 Indoor H2H 0

Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)

Gomez VS Jung H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-2 4-4 ret.
cross
Jason Jung
Player
Emilio Gomez
63% ( 40 of 64)
1st Serve %
59% ( 30 of 51)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
55% ( 22 of 40)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 18 of 30)
58% ( 14 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 8 of 21)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
43% ( 3 of 7)
44% ( 28 of 64)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 25 of 51)
61
Total Points Won
54
6-3 6-4
cross
Emilio Gomez
Player
Jason Jung
63% ( 42 of 67)
1st Serve %
63% ( 45 of 72)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
69% ( 29 of 42)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 27 of 45)
48% ( 12 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 11 of 27)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
25% ( 2 of 8)
39% ( 26 of 67)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 34 of 72)
75
Total Points Won
64
4-6 6-4 7-6(6)
cross
Emilio Gomez
Player
Jason Jung
62% ( 57 of 92)
1st Serve %
58% ( 61 of 105)
10
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
2
84% ( 48 of 57)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 43 of 61)
49% ( 17 of 35)
2nd Serve Won
64% ( 28 of 44)
33% ( 2 of 6)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
29% ( 27 of 92)
Rtn Points Won
32% ( 34 of 105)
99
Total Points Won
98

Gomez VS Jung H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Gomez Vs Jung H2H Stats
Emilio Gomez Gomez Stats Jason Jung Jung
2 H2H Matches 0
4 Sets Won 2
35 Games Won 33
14 Aces (Total) 14
12 Total Double Faults 11
1:47:43 Average Match Time 1:47:43
61% (129/210) 1st Serve % 61% (146/241)
74% (95/129) 1st Serve Win % 63% (92/146)
46% (37/81) 2nd Serve Win % 56% (53/95)
43% (9/21) Break Points Won % (Total) 47% (9/19)
40% (96/241) Return Points Win % 37% (78/210)
100% (2/2) Best of 3 Sets Win % 0% (0/2)
0% (0/0) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0)
100% (1/1) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 0% (0/1)
100% (1/1) Deciding Set Win % 0% (0/1)
100% (1/1) 1st Set Won, Won Match 50% (2/1)
0% (1/0) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 50% (2/1)
50% (2/1) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (1/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Emilio Gomez vs Jason Jung Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Gomez 2 - 1 Jung

Editorial Prediction:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gomez has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Jung has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gomez, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jung has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Gomez has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jung has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Gomez has won 27.27% of matches played (W/L 3/ 8), with Jung winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Gomez has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 216/ 136), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 13% (W/L 1/ 7). Jung has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 307/ 218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 20/ 26).
  • Player level: In the last year, Gomez has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 37.5% of matches (W/L 3/ 5), where as Jung has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Gomez winning 2 times and Jung being victorious 0 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Gomez winning 4 and Jung winning 2. The last match between Gomez and Jung was at the Savannah Challenger, 25-04-2022, First, Clay with Jason Jung getting the victory 6-2 4-4 ret..
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:47:43.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Gomez and Jung have played a deciding set 1 times, with Gomez winning 1 times and Jung 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Gomez winning 1, and Jung 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gomez has played against opponents with an average rank of 306.91 while Jung has played against players with an average rank of .
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gomez has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jung has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Gomez has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jung has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
  • Emilio Gomez Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    R1
    cross
    Felix Corwin
    Player
    Emilio Gomez
    51% ( 22 of 43)
    1st Serve %
    57% ( 32 of 56)
    4
    Aces
    1
    2
    Double Faults
    2
    86% ( 19 of 22)
    1st Serve Won
    59% ( 19 of 32)
    67% ( 14 of 21)
    2nd Serve Won
    50% ( 12 of 24)
    100% ( 2 of 2)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 2)
    23% ( 10 of 43)
    Rtn Points Won
    45% ( 25 of 56)
    58
    Total Points Won
    41
    L
    6-4 4-2 ret. H2H
    R1
    cross
    Aidan Mchugh
    Player
    Emilio Gomez
    70% ( 69 of 99)
    1st Serve %
    65% ( 66 of 101)
    2
    Aces
    0
    3
    Double Faults
    5
    64% ( 44 of 69)
    1st Serve Won
    62% ( 41 of 66)
    53% ( 16 of 30)
    2nd Serve Won
    46% ( 16 of 35)
    42% ( 5 of 12)
    Break Points Won
    75% ( 3 of 4)
    39% ( 39 of 99)
    Rtn Points Won
    44% ( 44 of 101)
    104
    Total Points Won
    96
    L
    6-4 6-7(3) 6-3 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Nicholas Godsick
    Player
    Emilio Gomez
    56% ( 44 of 78)
    1st Serve %
    63% ( 45 of 71)
    4
    Aces
    6
    4
    Double Faults
    5
    77% ( 34 of 44)
    1st Serve Won
    76% ( 34 of 45)
    44% ( 15 of 34)
    2nd Serve Won
    38% ( 10 of 26)
    50% ( 3 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 2 of 6)
    37% ( 29 of 78)
    Rtn Points Won
    38% ( 27 of 71)
    76
    Total Points Won
    73
    L
    7-6(3) 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Andrea Collarini
    Player
    Emilio Gomez
    73% ( 46 of 63)
    1st Serve %
    51% ( 31 of 61)
    2
    Aces
    1
    3
    Double Faults
    6
    61% ( 28 of 46)
    1st Serve Won
    61% ( 19 of 31)
    59% ( 10 of 17)
    2nd Serve Won
    33% ( 10 of 30)
    60% ( 6 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    60% ( 3 of 5)
    40% ( 25 of 63)
    Rtn Points Won
    52% ( 32 of 61)
    70
    Total Points Won
    54
    L
    6-2 7-5 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Karue Sell
    Player
    Emilio Gomez
    65% ( 37 of 57)
    1st Serve %
    59% ( 34 of 58)
    6
    Aces
    0
    3
    Double Faults
    4
    84% ( 31 of 37)
    1st Serve Won
    56% ( 19 of 34)
    40% ( 8 of 20)
    2nd Serve Won
    46% ( 11 of 24)
    67% ( 4 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 4)
    32% ( 18 of 57)
    Rtn Points Won
    48% ( 28 of 58)
    67
    Total Points Won
    48
    L
    6-2 6-3 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Facundo Mena
    Player
    Emilio Gomez
    55% ( 60 of 109)
    1st Serve %
    65% ( 72 of 111)
    4
    Aces
    1
    0
    Double Faults
    5
    67% ( 40 of 60)
    1st Serve Won
    56% ( 40 of 72)
    47% ( 23 of 49)
    2nd Serve Won
    46% ( 18 of 39)
    42% ( 8 of 19)
    Break Points Won
    35% ( 6 of 17)
    42% ( 46 of 109)
    Rtn Points Won
    48% ( 53 of 111)
    116
    Total Points Won
    104
    L
    5-7 6-3 7-5 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Emilio Gomez
    Player
    Bautista Vilicich
    62% ( 51 of 82)
    1st Serve %
    74% ( 52 of 70)
    2
    Aces
    0
    2
    Double Faults
    3
    67% ( 34 of 51)
    1st Serve Won
    56% ( 29 of 52)
    42% ( 13 of 31)
    2nd Serve Won
    39% ( 7 of 18)
    57% ( 4 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    38% ( 3 of 8)
    43% ( 35 of 82)
    Rtn Points Won
    49% ( 34 of 70)
    81
    Total Points Won
    71
    W
    6-3 7-6(2) H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Emilio Gomez
    Player
    Marcos Lee Chan Baratau
    76% ( 31 of 41)
    1st Serve %
    62% ( 24 of 39)
    1
    Aces
    0
    0
    Double Faults
    1
    71% ( 22 of 31)
    1st Serve Won
    50% ( 12 of 24)
    90% ( 9 of 10)
    2nd Serve Won
    20% ( 3 of 15)
    63% ( 5 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 1)
    24% ( 10 of 41)
    Rtn Points Won
    62% ( 24 of 39)
    55
    Total Points Won
    25
    W
    6-1 6-1 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Guido Ivan Justo
    Player
    Emilio Gomez
    62% ( 34 of 55)
    1st Serve %
    61% ( 36 of 59)
    3
    Aces
    0
    0
    Double Faults
    6
    62% ( 21 of 34)
    1st Serve Won
    36% ( 13 of 36)
    48% ( 10 of 21)
    2nd Serve Won
    35% ( 8 of 23)
    88% ( 7 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    44% ( 4 of 9)
    44% ( 24 of 55)
    Rtn Points Won
    64% ( 38 of 59)
    69
    Total Points Won
    45
    L
    6-4 6-3 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Emilio Gomez
    Player
    Enzo Camargo Lima
    46% ( 21 of 46)
    1st Serve %
    56% ( 27 of 48)
    1
    Aces
    1
    5
    Double Faults
    3
    71% ( 15 of 21)
    1st Serve Won
    44% ( 12 of 27)
    60% ( 15 of 25)
    2nd Serve Won
    29% ( 6 of 21)
    75% ( 6 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 1 of 4)
    35% ( 16 of 46)
    Rtn Points Won
    63% ( 30 of 48)
    60
    Total Points Won
    34
    W
    6-0 6-2 H2H

    Jason Jung Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    SF
    cross
    Matteo Gigante
    Player
    Jason Jung
    61% ( 42 of 69)
    1st Serve %
    68% ( 41 of 60)
    13
    Aces
    4
    5
    Double Faults
    2
    81% ( 34 of 42)
    1st Serve Won
    73% ( 30 of 41)
    52% ( 14 of 27)
    2nd Serve Won
    42% ( 8 of 19)
    40% ( 2 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 1)
    30% ( 21 of 69)
    Rtn Points Won
    37% ( 22 of 60)
    70
    Total Points Won
    59
    L
    6-3 7-5 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Jason Jung
    Player
    Ryan Peniston
    63% ( 40 of 63)
    1st Serve %
    53% ( 27 of 51)
    3
    Aces
    5
    0
    Double Faults
    1
    75% ( 30 of 40)
    1st Serve Won
    74% ( 20 of 27)
    57% ( 13 of 23)
    2nd Serve Won
    54% ( 13 of 24)
    75% ( 3 of 4)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 2)
    32% ( 20 of 63)
    Rtn Points Won
    35% ( 18 of 51)
    61
    Total Points Won
    53
    W
    6-4 6-3 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Jason Jung
    Player
    Aziz Dougaz
    60% ( 42 of 70)
    1st Serve %
    56% ( 45 of 80)
    2
    Aces
    10
    4
    Double Faults
    4
    76% ( 32 of 42)
    1st Serve Won
    78% ( 35 of 45)
    57% ( 16 of 28)
    2nd Serve Won
    40% ( 14 of 35)
    17% ( 2 of 12)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 1 of 2)
    31% ( 22 of 70)
    Rtn Points Won
    39% ( 31 of 80)
    79
    Total Points Won
    71
    W
    6-4 7-6(4) H2H
    R1
    cross
    Jason Jung
    Player
    Maximus Jones
    70% ( 31 of 44)
    1st Serve %
    60% ( 27 of 45)
    4
    Aces
    4
    1
    Double Faults
    2
    71% ( 22 of 31)
    1st Serve Won
    52% ( 14 of 27)
    62% ( 8 of 13)
    2nd Serve Won
    33% ( 6 of 18)
    71% ( 5 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 3)
    32% ( 14 of 44)
    Rtn Points Won
    56% ( 25 of 45)
    55
    Total Points Won
    34
    W
    6-2 6-1 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Manuel Guinard
    Player
    Jason Jung
    65% ( 47 of 72)
    1st Serve %
    66% ( 45 of 68)
    9
    Aces
    6
    3
    Double Faults
    2
    79% ( 37 of 47)
    1st Serve Won
    67% ( 30 of 45)
    52% ( 13 of 25)
    2nd Serve Won
    57% ( 13 of 23)
    33% ( 3 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    17% ( 1 of 6)
    31% ( 22 of 72)
    Rtn Points Won
    37% ( 25 of 68)
    75
    Total Points Won
    65
    L
    6-1 7-6(7) H2H
    R1
    cross
    Jason Jung
    Player
    Nick Hardt
    64% ( 34 of 53)
    1st Serve %
    80% ( 53 of 66)
    3
    Aces
    0
    1
    Double Faults
    0
    71% ( 24 of 34)
    1st Serve Won
    51% ( 27 of 53)
    58% ( 11 of 19)
    2nd Serve Won
    62% ( 8 of 13)
    40% ( 4 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 1 of 4)
    34% ( 18 of 53)
    Rtn Points Won
    47% ( 31 of 66)
    66
    Total Points Won
    53
    W
    6-4 6-2 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Yuta Shimizu
    Player
    Jason Jung
    66% ( 39 of 59)
    1st Serve %
    72% ( 53 of 74)
    5
    Aces
    1
    2
    Double Faults
    0
    82% ( 32 of 39)
    1st Serve Won
    57% ( 30 of 53)
    50% ( 10 of 20)
    2nd Serve Won
    48% ( 10 of 21)
    50% ( 4 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    67% ( 2 of 3)
    29% ( 17 of 59)
    Rtn Points Won
    46% ( 34 of 74)
    76
    Total Points Won
    57
    L
    6-4 7-5 H2H
    QF
    L
    6-4 6-3 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Jason Jung
    Player
    Yunseong Chung
    62% ( 56 of 90)
    1st Serve %
    64% ( 65 of 101)
    1
    Aces
    4
    4
    Double Faults
    2
    54% ( 30 of 56)
    1st Serve Won
    62% ( 40 of 65)
    56% ( 19 of 34)
    2nd Serve Won
    25% ( 9 of 36)
    47% ( 7 of 15)
    Break Points Won
    36% ( 4 of 11)
    46% ( 41 of 90)
    Rtn Points Won
    51% ( 52 of 101)
    101
    Total Points Won
    90
    W
    6-7(2) 6-3 4-1 ret. H2H
    R1
    cross
    Jason Jung
    Player
    Zdenek Kolar
    65% ( 48 of 74)
    1st Serve %
    55% ( 43 of 78)
    2
    Aces
    1
    2
    Double Faults
    2
    67% ( 32 of 48)
    1st Serve Won
    58% ( 25 of 43)
    50% ( 13 of 26)
    2nd Serve Won
    51% ( 18 of 35)
    67% ( 4 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    38% ( 3 of 8)
    39% ( 29 of 74)
    Rtn Points Won
    45% ( 35 of 78)
    80
    Total Points Won
    72
    W
    6-4 7-6(4) H2H
    banner

    Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

    Gomez & Jung Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
    Emilio Gomez Gomez Stats Jason Jung Jung
    56% (427/330) Win/Loss 56% (412/327)
    55% (978/787) Sets Win/Loss 55% (943/772)
    52% (8718/8082) Games Win/Loss 52% (8517/7832)
    0.23 Aces Per Game 0.24
    1861 Aces Total 1910
    0.24 Double Faults Per Game 0.2
    1946 Total Double Faults 1587
    1:17:42 Average Match Time 1:12:25
    494.72 Average Opponent Rank 197.31
    60% (25301/42238) 1st Serve % 63% (25122/39622)
    68% (17304/25301) 1st Serve Win % 69% (17225/25122)
    50% (8445/16937) 2nd Serve Win % 51% (7428/14500)
    42% (1738/4098) Break Points Won % (Total) 40% (1570/3886)
    39% (16431/41644) Return Points Win % 39% (15757/40281)
    56% (413/731) Best of 3 Sets Win % 57% (407/711)
    57% (12/21) Best of 5 Sets Win % 9% (2/22)
    55% (141/256) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 50% (119/236)
    50% (114/228) Deciding Set Win % 52% (112/215)
    85% (438/374) 1st Set Won, Won Match 85% (413/351)
    14% (438/63) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 15% (413/62)
    16% (319/51) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 18% (325/60)

    Other Predictions

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction
    • Loading news...